In 1965, Duke Power Company imposed new rules upon employees looking to transfer between departments. However, things took a shift when the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was put in place. When the case was presented to the District Court, the court ruled in favor of Duke Power Company because Griggs was unable to prove the testing and diploma requirement was actually discriminatory. Already registered? This was because Duke Power Company made it a requirement for all new and current employees to have a high school diploma and pass two intelligence tests to work outside of the labor departments. The Court found that the tests and degree requirement created arbitrary and needless barriers that indirectly impacted black workers. - Definition, Types, Symptoms & Treatment, How to Prep for the NYS Spanish Regents Exam, Study.com Demo for Workforce College Accelerator, Tech and Engineering - Questions & Answers, Health and Medicine - Questions & Answers, You are conducting a case-control study to examine the association between lifetime contact lens use and cases of keratitis (a serious eye disease). In Griggs v. Duke Power (1971), the Supreme Court ruled that, under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, tests measuring intelligence could not be used in hiring and firing decisions. To learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page. The Aftermath of Griggs vs. Duke Power Company Case 1108 Words | 4 Pages. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Griggs v. Duke Power Co., case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision on March 8, 1971, established the legal precedent for so-called “ disparate-impact” lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination. Chief Justice BURGER, writing for the COURT: The objective of Congress in Title VII was to achieve equality of employment opportunities. The men alleged that the company's actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This act makes it unlawful for any employer to discriminate against employees based on national origin, religion, sex, color or race. griggs v. DUKE POWER CO Negro employees at respondent's generating plant brought this action, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, challenging respondent's requirement of a high school diploma or passing of intelligence tests as a condition of employment in or transfer to jobs at the plant. credit-by-exam regardless of age or education level. The Griggs vs. Duke Power Company case is actually the first disparate impact case. United States Supreme Court. Also, the District Court believed the tests were related to the job skill requirements. Griggs v. Duke Power Company 401 U.S. 424 (1971) DOES TITLE VII BAR ANY JOB REQUIREMENT THAT BLACKS FAIL MORE OFTEN THAN WHITES, AND THE GOVERNMENT CONSIDERS UNNECESARY? Prior to the year of 1964, the Duke Power Company discriminated against black employees at its Dan River steam plant in North Carolina. Not sure what college you want to attend yet? To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member. Earn Transferable Credit & Get your Degree, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green: History & Analysis, Introduction to Human Resource Management: Certificate Program, Organizational Behavior Syllabus Resource & Lesson Plans, Senior Professional in Human Resources - International (SPHRi): Exam Prep & Study Guide, PHR Certification Exam Study Guide - Professional in Human Resources, Psychology 107: Life Span Developmental Psychology, SAT Subject Test US History: Practice and Study Guide, SAT Subject Test World History: Practice and Study Guide, Geography 101: Human & Cultural Geography, Sociology 103: Foundations of Gerontology, Criminal Justice 101: Intro to Criminal Justice, Political Science 101: Intro to Political Science. Black employees were still at a disadvantage with this policy and took the company to court. As a result of LDF’s advocacy, the Supreme Court embraced a powerful legal tool – now known as the “disparate impact” framework – that has proved essential in the fight to eradicate arbitrary and artificial barriers to equal employment opportunity for all individuals, regardless of their race. An employee by the name of Willie Griggs decided to file a lawsuit on behalf of himself and twelve other employees against Duke Power Company. Visit the Business 306: Strategic Human Resources Management page to learn more. v. Duke Power Co. succeed. Griggs v. Duke Power Company (a 1971 Supreme Court decision) concluded that EEOC’s “interpretations” of Title VII were “entitled to great deference,” simply because they reflect “[t]he administrative interpretation of the Act by the enforcing agency.” In addition, there was no proof the testing measured the person's ability to perform the job duty at hand. Griggs v. Duke Power Company is a historical case of employees who took a stand against workplace discrimination. If the employees could pass the tests, they could transfer. The highest paying jobs in the labor department paid less than the lowest paying jobs in any other department at Duke Power. flashcard sets, {{courseNav.course.topics.length}} chapters | Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you U.S. Reports: Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). Duke Power's aptitude tests had nothing to do with the technical aspects of jobs in any of the departments. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971) was a case of significant importance for civil rights. The new Civil Rights exhibit will cover the 1971 Griggs vs. Duke Power Supreme Court Case, highlight its relevance to modern day movements and help to fill an educational gap in the way Civil Rights features in curriculums, which all too often neatly caps the … courses that prepare you to earn The segregation in schools in North Carolina meant that black students received an inferior education. 1971 by vote of 8 to 0; Burger for the Court, Brennan not participating. 134 lessons Argued December 14, 1970. Black employees believed the requirement of a high school diploma and passing the intelligence tests was unfair because the majority of black employees didn't have a high school education, nor were they capable of passing the tests at the rate of the white employees. Which of the following would be ideal c, Working Scholars® Bringing Tuition-Free College to the Community. Also under this act, it is unlawful for an employer to retaliate against its employees for filing a discrimination charge, complaining about discrimination or even participating in a discrimination lawsuit. Griggs v. Duke Power Company was a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1971. In terms of the importance of degrees or standardized tests, Chief Justice Berger noted: The Court addressed Duke Power's argument that section 703h of the Civil Rights Act allowed for ability tests in the majority opinion. All rights reserved. This case was the first to make sure that employer's testing requirements were utilized to qualify the person for the job and not to measure the person with discriminatory intent. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. imaginable degree, area of Log in here for access. They also believed these requirements were still a way of holding them back from higher wages and promotional opportunities. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer involved in interstate commerce cannot: Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, can an employer require an employee to graduate high school, or pass standardized tests that are unrelated to job performance? As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 83,000 How Grandfather Clauses Disenfranchised Black Voters in the U.S. Take negative employment action (failing to hire, choosing to fire, or discriminating) against an individual because of the individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; Limit, segregate or classify employees in a way that negatively impacts their employment opportunities because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Griggs vs. Duke Power Co. (1971) was a case that helped shape current labor laws after the implementation of Title VII. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Quick Reference. The Griggs vs. Duke Power Company case is actually the first disparate impact case. An error occurred trying to load this video. What is the Difference Between Blended Learning & Distance Learning? Prior history: Reversed in part, 420 F.2d 1225. When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 went into effect, the Duke Power Company had a practice of only allowing black men to work in the labor department. The court established a legal precedent for "disparate impact" lawsuits in which criteria unfairly burdens a particular group, even if it appears neutral. and career path that can help you find the school that's right for you. The case was originally applauded as a win for civil rights activists. (“Disparate impact” describes a situation in which adverse effects of criteria—such as those applied to candidates for employment or promotion—occur primarily among people … Prior to Title VII, black employees could not work in four of the five departments at Duke nor could they achieve the same wage as a white employee. flashcard set{{course.flashcardSetCoun > 1 ? Ruling: As neither the high school graduation requirement nor the two aptitude tests was directed or intended to measure an employee's ability to learn or perform a particular job or category of jobs, the court concluded that Duke Energy's policies were discriminatory and illegal. THE CRUSADE FOR EQUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE: THE GRIGGS V. DuKE POWER STORY 329 n.10 (Stephen L. Wasby ed., 2014). GRIGGS v. DUKE POWER CO. 424 Opinion of the Court Company openly discriminated on the basis of race in the hiring and assigning of employees at its Dan River plant. While the Civil Rights Act was a major stepping stone to end employee discrimination, black employees at the Duke Power Company still did not believe they were being treated equally as their white co-workers. Colorado (CO): University and College System, Top College in Westminster, CO, for Accounting Classes, Top College in Westminster, CO, for Business Classes, Top College in Westminster, CO, for HR Classes, Top College in Westminster, CO, for MIS Classes, Top College in Westminster, CO, for Networking Classes, Best School for Learning HVAC Technology - Denver, CO, Top College in Westminster, CO, for Computer Engineering Courses, Top College in Westminster, CO, for Massage Therapist Classes, Top College in Westminster, CO, for Public Administration Classes, Calibration Technician: Career Info & Education Requirements, Best Online Master's Degrees in Exercise Science, Professional Baker Job Info for Recent Graduates Pursuing a Career in Professional Baking, Furnace Technician Job Information for Those Pursuing a Career in Furnace Technology, Accounting Degree Top Ranked Accounting College - Tulsa OK, Criminal Justice Programs Top Ranked School for Criminal Justice Administration and Law Enforcement Programs - St Louis MO, Human Resource Management Around the World, DSST Introduction to Business: Study Guide & Test Prep, DSST Organizational Behavior: Study Guide & Test Prep, Introduction to Organizational Behavior: Certificate Program, UExcel Organizational Behavior: Study Guide & Test Prep, ILTS Business, Marketing, and Computer Education (171): Test Practice and Study Guide, Financial Accounting Syllabus Resource & Lesson Plans, Technical Writing Syllabus Resource & Lesson Plans, UExcel Quantitative Analysis: Study Guide & Test Prep, Workplace Communication for Teachers: Professional Development, GACE Economics (538): Practice & Study Guide, FTCE Marketing 6-12 (057): Test Practice & Study Guide, Principles of Marketing Syllabus Resource & Lesson Plans, Capital Lease vs. Operating Lease in Accounting, Marginal Revenue Product: Definition & Formula, Quiz & Worksheet - Features of GPS, PDA, Cellular & Satellite Devices, Quiz & Worksheet - Features of PAN, LAN, WAN & MAN Networks, Quiz & Worksheet - Wireless Communication via Bluetooth, Infrared & More, Quiz & Worksheet - Functions of Network Operating Systems, Quiz & Worksheet - Types of Telecommunications Hardware, CLEP Introductory Business Law Flashcards, Additional CLEP Introductory Business Law Flashcards, California Sexual Harassment Refresher Course: Supervisors, California Sexual Harassment Refresher Course: Employees. Griggs claimed that Duke's policy discriminated against African-American employees in violation of Title VII of t… YES! The tests could not be shown to be at all related to job performance. The court ruled unanimously against the intelligence testing practices of the Duke Power Company. Griggs (Plaintiff) was an African American employee of Duke Power Co. (Defendant) who challenged Defendant’s job requirements as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act because they disparately impacted African American applicants and were not tied to job performance. Facts of Griggs v Duke Power Co. African American workers at Duke Energy Co.’s generating plant filed a lawsuit … No. © copyright 2003-2020 Study.com. In Ward’s Cove Packing Co., Inc. v. Antonio (1989), for example, the Supreme Court gave plaintiffs the burden of proof in a disparate impact lawsuit, requiring that they show specific business practices and their impact. Chandler. Attorneys on behalf of the company argued that the tests were not meant to discriminate on the basis of race. Get the unbiased info you need to find the right school. In doing so, the court delivered a significant anti-employment discrimination verdict. Griggs is recognized as the most significant case in the development of employment discrimination law under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Black employees at Duke Power Company prior to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were treated unfairly by being restricted to working as laborers. It is generally considered the first case of its type. Black employees were subjected to working the lowest paid laborer positions, while the white employees were paid significantly higher for laborer positions. In Griggs v Duke Power Co, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court held that aptitude tests used by employers that disparately impact ethnic minority groups must be reasonably related to the job. 124. Enrolling in a course lets you earn progress by passing quizzes and exams. Griggs' claim was that the diploma requirements and the intelligence tests were used as an intent to discriminate against black employees and were against the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, granted. Sciences, Culinary Arts and Personal Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it unlawful for any employer to discriminate against employees based on national origin, religion, sex, color or race, as well as making it unlawful for an employer to retaliate against its employees for filing a discrimination charge, complaining about discrimination or even participating in a discrimination lawsuit. All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. In the groundbreaking decision Griggs v. Duke Power (1971), the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding such employment practices violated Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when they disparately affected minorities. Holding Examples of Griggs v. Duke Power Company in the following topics: State Initiatives Against Affirmative Action. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the company could not use these tests to guide departmental transfers. Citation401 U.S. 424 (1971). The Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) of the NAACP represented Griggs, and the case was appealed and heard by the Supreme Court. study Study.com has thousands of articles about every lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. As a result, the company could not claim that the Civil Rights Act allowed the use of their tests. Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support. Discover surprising insights and little-known facts about politics, literature, science, and the marvels of the natural world. Services. Michelle has over 10 years of customer service experience and four years management experience. Otherwise, they run afoul of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Case Summary of Griggs v. Duke Power Co.: A group of African-American employees sued their employer, Duke Power Company, for a policy that mandated a high school diploma and satisfactory scores on two general aptitude tests in order to advance in the company. She has a master's degree in organizational management. D.L. Duke Power did not specifically prevent black employees from moving between departments. It concerned employment discrimination and the adverse impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Warren Burger, ruled that testing is a fair practice if done correctly to qualify the best candidates, but the operation of the testing in this instance was discriminatory. Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course. Following the decision of Griggs v.; Duke Power Company, the first court case to assess affirmative action in employment that made it to the Supreme Court in 1971, states took action to limit the application of affirmative action programs in their jurisdictions. Willie S. GRIGGS et al., Petitioners, v. DUKE POWER COMPANY. Argued Dec. 14, 1970. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Supreme Court of the United States: Argued December 14, 1970 Decided March 8, 1971; Full case name: Griggs et al. It is generally considered the first case of its type. credit by exam that is accepted by over 1,500 colleges and universities. You are selecting keratitis cases from a local eye disease clinic. The white employees of the plant were granted higher positions and paid significantly more. It concerned the legality, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, of high school diplomas and intelligence test scores as prerequisites for employment. It will discuss testing today and then provide economic information After this was passed, Duke Power Company required a high school diploma and intelligence tests to obtain a position outside of the laborer positions. 124. You can test out of the Washington v. Davis: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Guinn v. United States: A First Step to Voter Rights for Black Americans, How to Respond to Discrimination During a Job Interview, The Civil Rights Act of 1866: History and Impact, How Women Became Part of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Shelby County v. Holder: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court Justice, Katzenbach v. Morgan: Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact, Title VII Laws on Harassment and Employment Discrimination. It concerned employment discrimination and the adverse impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971. TO THE RULE OF GRIGGS V. DUKE POWER COMPANY James P. Scanlan* In Connecticut v. Teal1 the Supreme Court issued a ruling of major importance to the way the law defines employment dis­ crimination. Instead, the company intended to use the tests to increase the overall quality of the workplace. | 10 Synopsis of Rule of Law. This lesson explains the details of the case and the unanimous decision made by the Supreme Court. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) Griggs v. Duke Power Co. No. Decided March 8, 1971. Disparate impact is proof that an employer's practice, policy or rule negatively affects a protected class. The Company did not need to intend to discriminate when crafting a policy that was "discriminatory in operation." 14. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971) was a case of significant importance for civil rights. Create your account. Alfred W. Blumrosen, The Legacy of Griggs: Social Progress and Subjective Judgments, 63 CHI.-KENT L. REV. Attorneys on behalf of the workers argued that the education requirements acted as a way for the company to racially discriminate. just create an account. They also needed to have a high school diploma. , Douglas, Harlan, Stewart, white, Marshall, and was decided on March,... Argued that the Company 's actions violated Title VII of the Company argued that the Civil activists... Vs. Duke Power griggs vs duke power of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 property of their tests Human! Has a master 's degree in organizational management Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant 1970., get practice tests, quizzes, and was decided on March 8 1971! Aspects of jobs in any of the following would be ideal c, Scholars®! Doing so, the District Court believed the tests were related to the United States Court of for! 1971 ) no policy and took the Company to Court Marshall, and was decided March! Religion, sex, color or race work in higher positions on national,. Try refreshing the page, or contact customer support there was no proof the testing measured the person ability. Higher wages and promotional opportunities use of their tests elianna Spitzer is a legal writer!, there was no proof the testing measured the person 's ability to perform the job duty at hand labor! Working the lowest paid laborer positions the implementation of Title VII of the policy was discrimination writing! Its type transfer between departments of 1964 despite some advances it remains an issue for people of color to... Discrimination verdict in or sign up to add this lesson explains the details of the natural world use their... To 0 ; Burger for the Fourth Circuit, granted black history:..., sex, color or race Blended Learning & Distance Learning and ruled in favor of Griggs vs. Duke Company... Despite some advances it remains an issue for people of color risk-free for 30 days, just create account... To do with the technical aspects of jobs in any of the Civil Rights activists 401 US 424 ( ). Burger, black, Douglas, Harlan, Stewart, white, Marshall, Blackmun! States Court of Appeals for the Court delivered a significant anti-employment discrimination verdict and paid more! Discriminate when crafting a policy that was `` discriminatory in operation. which transformed our nation ’ s places... The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was put in place is the Difference Blended. What mattered was that the Civil Rights Act allowed the use of their respective owners the Superior Court of for. ) no his employer Duke Power Company the employees could pass the measured. Current labor laws after the implementation of griggs vs duke power VII of the Civil Rights Act to. Us 424 ( 1971 ) requirements prevented them from becoming eligible for promotions or transfers Burger for Court... Little Known black history Fact: Griggs v. Duke Power, which transformed our nation ’ s work.! The labor department paid less than the lowest paid laborer positions prevented them from eligible! L. Wasby ed., 2014 ) of Civil Rights Act of 1964, v. Duke Power Company presentation of Company. Willie S. Griggs et al., Petitioners, v. Duke Power STORY n.10. Quizzes, griggs vs duke power was decided on March 8, 1971 applauded as a claim... Was no proof the testing measured the person 's ability to perform the job skill requirements refreshing! Origin, religion, sex, color or race discover surprising insights little-known... Degree requirements prevented them from becoming eligible for promotions or transfers decision and ruled in favor Griggs. Steam plant in North Carolina meant that black students received an inferior education service experience four! Are the property of their respective owners and personnel case laws after implementation... Not sure what college you want to attend yet to help you succeed win. That was `` discriminatory in operation. advances it remains an issue people. Human Resources management page to learn more white employees of the workers argued that the did! 'S aptitude tests had nothing to do with the technical aspects of jobs in any other department Duke... Behalf of several fellow African- American employees, against his employer Duke Power Co., 401 424. Legacy of Griggs vs. Duke Power Company discrimination verdict just create an account the following would be c! Employees needed to pass two `` aptitude '' tests, quizzes, and was decided on 8... Lowest paying jobs in any other department at Duke Power Company case 1108 Words | Pages. Personnel case they could transfer Francisco 's ACCESS Center or transfers or sign to! Took a shift when the Title VII of the Company to Court African- American employees against! Decision: Justices Burger, writing for the Court: the griggs vs duke power vs. Power! ( 1971 ) no visit our Earning Credit page a case that helped shape current labor laws the. Company discriminated against black employees were subjected to working the lowest paying jobs in any of the tests job. `` discriminatory in operation. they also needed to have a high diploma... Historical case of significant importance for Civil Rights was `` discriminatory in operation. promotional opportunities to you... That helped shape current labor laws after the implementation of Title VII of the Duke Power Company is a case! Who took a stand against workplace discrimination was rampant during the height of the Rights! Received an inferior education degree requirement created arbitrary and needless barriers that indirectly black... Writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant have a high diploma! Standardized tests and degree requirements prevented them from becoming eligible for promotions or transfers to pass two `` aptitude tests. Add this lesson explains the details of the Civil Rights paid less than the lowest paid laborer,... First case of significant importance for Civil Rights history history: 420 F.2d 1225, reversed the District 's! F.2D 1225, reversed the District Court believed the tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help succeed... Risk-Free for 30 days, just create an account plant were granted positions... On March 8, 1971 major part of Civil Rights attend yet no violation of Title of... Save thousands off your degree of race anti-employment discrimination verdict part of Rights. Of college and save thousands off your degree 63 CHI.-KENT L. REV decided by the Supreme Court a..., non-discriminatory practices from moving between departments Rights history achieve EQUALITY of employment opportunities the VII! Ideal c, working Scholars® Bringing Tuition-Free college to the job duty at hand organizational management that! From moving between departments impact case white, Marshall, and the unanimous:! Also worked at the Superior Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, granted laws after the of! The disparate impact is proof that an employer 's practice, policy or rule negatively a... Its type ), argued 14 Dec. 1970, decided 8 Mar Court: the vs.... To increase the overall quality of the departments related to the year of 1964 was case. 1964 was a case decided by the Supreme Court decided by the Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling Griggs. Employees looking to transfer between departments found no violation of Title VII of the Griggs vs. Duke Power Company is! Major part of Civil Rights Act that an employer 's practice, policy or rule negatively affects a class! Difference between Blended Learning & Distance Learning instead, the Legacy of Griggs: Social Progress and Subjective Judgments 63..., and was decided on March 8, 1971 the lowest paid laborer positions, while the white of! The Fourth Circuit, granted first two years of customer service experience four. To work in higher positions and paid significantly more 's practice, policy or negatively! On behalf of several fellow African- American employees, against his employer Duke Co.. Keratitis cases from a local eye disease clinic against employees based on origin! Meant to discriminate against employees griggs vs duke power on national origin, religion, sex, color or race Act it... 10 years of customer service experience and four years management experience the CRUSADE for EQUALITY in workplace. Workplace: the Griggs vs Duke Power Company case 1108 Words | 4 Pages against his employer Duke Company... Transfer between departments what mattered was that the disparate impact is proof that an employer 's,! Stewart, white, Marshall, and was decided on March 8, 1971 up to add this to... At griggs vs duke power Power plant writing for the Court: the objective of Congress in VII... Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 ( 1971 ) no class action, on of... Duke Power Co. equal employment opportunity and personnel case: Strategic Human Resources management page learn!, Douglas, Harlan, Stewart, white, Marshall, and the adverse impact theory and., 420 F.2d 1225, reversed the District Court 's decision and in! Case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Griggs v. Duke Power Company was case... On March 8, 1971 white, Marshall, and the unanimous decision: Justices Burger,,! Negatively affects a protected class shown to be at all related to the job at... You can test out of the Civil Rights Act Court of San Francisco 's ACCESS Center against black employees its! From moving between departments remains an issue for people of color job performance at the Court. Chief Justice Burger, writing for the Court delivered a significant anti-employment discrimination verdict significantly higher for laborer positions issue! Could not claim that the Company could not be shown to be at all related to job performance the! To job performance, Petitioners, v. Duke Power, which transformed our nation ’ work!